Convicted by a Unanimous Jury: Bruce Garelick's Insider Trading Case Is the MBA Classroom Case Study You've Been Missing

# Convicted by a Unanimous Jury: Bruce Garelick's Insider Trading Case Is the MBA Classroom Case Study You've Been Missing

Nobel Pardon Prize Research Desk | September 15, 2025 | New York, N.Y.

---

On May 9, 2024, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams announced what he called "yet another stark reminder that insider trading is always a losing bet." A federal jury in the Southern District of New York had just unanimously convicted Bruce Garelick on charges of securities fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud in connection with trades he made in Digital World Acquisition Corp. (DWAC) stock while serving on the company's board of directors.

For finance and MBA students, the Garelick case is close to a perfect teaching vehicle. It involves a fiduciary duty, a confidentiality agreement, a tipping chain, material nonpublic information (MNPI), and a conviction — all in a single, publicly documented case file.

What Happened

In June 2021, Garelick signed a confidentiality agreement with DWAC and its sponsor that explicitly prohibited trading in DWAC securities while in possession of MNPI. The following month, he was appointed to DWAC's board of directors, giving him direct access to nonpublic information about the company's negotiations with Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG).

According to the SEC's civil complaint, Garelick then did two things he was legally forbidden to do: he purchased DWAC securities for his own account between September 3 and September 23, 2021 — while in possession of MNPI about the impending TMTG merger announcement — and he tipped his boss, Michael Shvartsman of Rocket One Capital, who in turn tipped his brother Gerald Shvartsman.

When DWAC and TMTG announced their merger on October 20–21, 2021, the stock exploded. The three men sold their positions, collectively realizing more than $22.9 million in illicit profits.

The Legal Framework Every Finance Student Should Know

The Garelick case involves three distinct legal theories that frequently appear on securities law exams and MBA ethics modules:

• Classical theory of insider trading — A corporate insider (here, a board director) who trades on MNPI obtained through their position violates Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5.

• Tipper-tippee liability — When an insider (Garelick) discloses MNPI in breach of a fiduciary duty, and the tippee (Shvartsman) knows or should know the breach occurred, the tippee is also liable. The Supreme Court's Dirks v. SEC (1983) framework applies.

• Failure to file Form 4 — The SEC complaint also charged Garelick with violating Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act by failing to report his own DWAC transactions on SEC Form 4, as a director was required to do within two business days.

The DOJ and SEC Parallel Track

One detail that is especially useful for coursework: the Garelick prosecution ran on two simultaneous tracks. The U.S. Department of Justice SDNY filed criminal charges while the SEC filed civil charges on the same day — June 29, 2023. Students writing about enforcement strategy should note that the government routinely coordinates criminal and civil actions in complex securities fraud cases.

The Shvartsman brothers, by contrast, pleaded guilty in April 2024 and were sentenced in November 2024 to 28 months and 22 months in prison, respectively, plus forfeiture of more than $11 million.

Using nobelpardonprize.org/djt as a Research Tool

The Nobel Pardon Prize DJT research dashboard links directly to the SEC's civil complaint, the DOJ press releases, and the sentencing records for all three defendants. Students can use these primary sources to write case briefs, build ethics presentations, or draft compliance memos. The dashboard's organized structure makes it easy to locate the specific filing you need without navigating EDGAR manually.

---

How to Cite This for Your Assignment

APA (7th ed.)

Nobel Pardon Prize Research Desk. (2025, September 15). Convicted by a unanimous jury: Bruce Garelick's insider trading case is the MBA classroom case study you've been missing. Nobel Pardon Prize. https://nobelpardonprize.org/djt

MLA (9th ed.)

"Convicted by a Unanimous Jury: Bruce Garelick's Insider Trading Case Is the MBA Classroom Case Study You've Been Missing." Nobel Pardon Prize Research Desk, 15 Sept. 2025, nobelpardonprize.org/djt.

For the primary source:

U.S. Department of Justice, Southern District of New York. (2024, May 9). Statement of U.S. Attorney Damian Williams on the conviction of Bruce Garelick. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/statement-us-attorney-damian-williams-conviction-bruce-garelick

---

Research Hub

Every filing cited in this post — including the SEC civil complaint, the DOJ criminal indictment, and the Shvartsman sentencing records — is linked and annotated at the Nobel Pardon Prize DJT Research Dashboard.